Planners facing bad debt challenges
Virtually all planners may be ready to handle the new Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes but too few are ready to handle chasing clients who won't pay their bills, according to Leading Minds Academy principal Brian Boggs.
Commenting on a recent debate among advisers about what they should do when clients refuse to pay their bills, Boggs said this represented a manifestation of the switch from commissions to fee for service.
"Under the old commissions regime, an adviser's greatest fear might be that for some reason your commissions did not get paid. Under the FOFA regime and fee for service there is the reality of small planning practices having to manage debtors," he said.
Boggs said that advisers were now having to act in the same manner as accountants and lawyers in learning to spell out the terms of their engagement and how to bill their clients.
"The problem is that some advisers have yet to entirely learn than lesson," he said.
Discussion around providing financial advice and chasing bad debts was prompted by recent comments by a Perth-based adviser who sought opinions on how to handle a client who had refused to pay for his advice.
Recommended for you
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
