Planners face wall over wider GST

financial planners financial services association government chief executive FPA IFSA

2 September 1999
| By Jason |

The implementation of a wider GST on financial services poses a serious threat to financial planners, according to industry figures.

The implementation of a wider GST on financial services poses a serious threat to financial planners, according to industry figures.

A consultation paper released by the Government says the full GST will apply to a large number of services provided by financial institutions. Commission-based groups will pay GST on all revenue and receive no tax credits. However, those not charging will be taxed and will receive tax credits.

Financial Planning Association (FPA) chief executive Michael McKenna says finan-cial planners will have difficulty in implementing many of the measures.

The chief area of concern is who will pay the costs. Gadens Lawyers financial services partner Phil Heraghty says there will be consumer resistance to any price hikes in financial planners' services.

"At the coalface, planners will probably absorb most of the GST into the prac-tice with the result: a drop in profitability," Heraghty says.

Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) chief executive Lynn Ralph believes the wider GST coverage will also threaten fund managers. Most inputs into retail products are financial supplies, which will be fully taxed under the new system.

Ralph says that depending on the size and nature of the tax credits, there will be upward pressure on prices of managed funds.

She says the tax has the potential to give overseas companies a lift over Aus-tralian rivals.

"This proposal has the potential to place Australian fund managers at a competi-tive disadvantage with other financial centres. This would be an unfortunate outcome that could work against Australia's bid to become a global financial centre."

The FPA and IFSA have both questioned the new rules after the Government stated last August that most financial services would be input taxed and not fall under a direct GST.

As a result, both groups are examining the statement and will make submissions to the Government.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 5 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS