Planners avoid payroll tax headache

remuneration insurance compliance financial planning businesses dealer groups financial services association IFSA

13 August 2003
| By Ben Abbott |

NSW-based financial planners will avoid the added burden of payroll tax due to an ‘imminent’ ruling by the NSW Office of State Revenue (OSR) that will recognise planners alongside insurance agents, exempting them from the state’s payroll tax contractor provisions.

According to theInvestment and Financial Services Association(IFSA), the decision to exempt planners from the tax is based on the way their businesses are structured and remuneration is obtained.

IFSA deputy chief executive Joanne Bloch says the association’s discussions with the NSW Government on the issue have been very positive, and she expects a resolution very soon that “has industry needs in mind”.

“They have been receptive to our representations and we are very optimistic about a positive outcome,” Bloch says.

The decision will follow a September 2002 report on payroll tax compliance, which recommended financial planners be exempted from the payroll tax contractor provisions.

The report was compiled by two independent professionals — consultant, Penny Le Couteur, and University of NSW faculty of law associate professor, Neil Warren.

Pending a decision on the recommendations, the OSR suspended all payroll tax audits of remuneration payments to advisers at the end of last year and now says it will not commence any new audits.

Bloch says that until now, financial planning businesses generally have not been paying the tax, as they have been treated like insurance agents, who historically have been exempt from the tax.

Bloch adds, however, that financial planning remained “an area of grey” for the NSW OSR.

The decision is expected to be a victory for theFinancial Planning Association, which targeted NSW in its drive for exemption from state payroll tax regimes because of the state-based report.

The payroll tax issue came to a head after the OSR issued tax assessments to dealer groups based on the assumption planners were direct employees of the dealer groups and not self-employed contractors, exposing the dealers to the payroll duties.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS