Planner super competence questioned
The competence of financial planners to provide appropriate advice around superannuation has been identified as an area of concern by two offshore academics providing a submission to the Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into the competitive and efficiency of the superannuation system.
Discussing the backdrop against which the PC is considering the superannuation industry, the two academics – Nicholas Barr and Peter Diamond from the London School of Economics and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology pointed to the finance advice as being a problem area alongside fund fees that do not reflect performance.
The pair said problems arose with respect to financial advice in superannuation, “even where providers generally try to do a good job”.
“For example, it is not clear how to choose a good financial adviser,” the submission said before adding that some might be of limited competence meaning the complexity of the superannuation system meant they might not do a good job on some issues.
The submission also pointed to the risk of “biased advice” where advisers might suggest the wrong product or the wrong price and the risk of deception where there was a lack of consumer information and missing or ineffective regulation – something which led to the risk of misleading advertising and mis-selling.
The submission suggested that these problems also applied to the draw-down phase and was “compounded by annuity markets that are frequently thin and often offer poor value”.
The two academics then used their submission to recommend a single, government-organised default life-cycle structure, claiming that both the default and the pension system as a whole would benefit from a single contribution collector and record-keeper.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
