Planner profits already hurt by FOFA

FOFA financial planning wealth insights planners financial planners government cent senator mathias cormann future of financial advice

25 November 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Financial planners were feeling the squeeze from higher regulatory obligations even before the Government's changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) laws were overturned in the Senate.

That is the bottom line of new research conducted by Wealth Insights which has revealed that planners were seeing higher compliance costs impacting their profit margins even without adding the costs of "opt-in" and increased fee disclosure, both of which had been substantially removed in the now-defunct regulatory changes introduced by the Minister for Finance and Acting Assistant Treasurer, Senator Mathias Cormann.

Commenting on the research, Wealth Insights managing director, Vanessa McMahon said there was no question that FOFA had adversely impacted planner profit margins and that the reversal of the Government's regulations by the Senate would create further pressure on their bottom line.

The Wealth Insights research sought to gain a picture of the impact of compliance costs on planners looking back over the past two years and found that the majority had seen a negative impact to their bottom line with compliance costs increasing, generating a commensurate decrease in profitability.

The company asked planners the simple question, what has been the impact of regulatory change on profit over the past couple of years?

Forty four per cent of advisers said they had seen their profit decrease, with seven per cent of those people pointing to a decrease of more than 20 per cent.

This compared to only 27 per cent of those surveyed who said their profit had increased and 30 per cent who said their had been no impact.

McMahon said it was clear that the compliance costs associated with FOFA had been problematic for planners even in an environment where they knew the Government was seeking to reduce what it regarded as undue red tape.

"It follows that the changes resulting from the Senate vote will have a negative impact," she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS