Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Planner profits already hurt by FOFA

FOFA/financial-planning/wealth-insights/planners/financial-planners/government/cent/senator-mathias-cormann/future-of-financial-advice/

25 November 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Financial planners were feeling the squeeze from higher regulatory obligations even before the Government's changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) laws were overturned in the Senate.

That is the bottom line of new research conducted by Wealth Insights which has revealed that planners were seeing higher compliance costs impacting their profit margins even without adding the costs of "opt-in" and increased fee disclosure, both of which had been substantially removed in the now-defunct regulatory changes introduced by the Minister for Finance and Acting Assistant Treasurer, Senator Mathias Cormann.

Commenting on the research, Wealth Insights managing director, Vanessa McMahon said there was no question that FOFA had adversely impacted planner profit margins and that the reversal of the Government's regulations by the Senate would create further pressure on their bottom line.

The Wealth Insights research sought to gain a picture of the impact of compliance costs on planners looking back over the past two years and found that the majority had seen a negative impact to their bottom line with compliance costs increasing, generating a commensurate decrease in profitability.

The company asked planners the simple question, what has been the impact of regulatory change on profit over the past couple of years?

Forty four per cent of advisers said they had seen their profit decrease, with seven per cent of those people pointing to a decrease of more than 20 per cent.

This compared to only 27 per cent of those surveyed who said their profit had increased and 30 per cent who said their had been no impact.

McMahon said it was clear that the compliance costs associated with FOFA had been problematic for planners even in an environment where they knew the Government was seeking to reduce what it regarded as undue red tape.

"It follows that the changes resulting from the Senate vote will have a negative impact," she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND