Planner licensing to cost more under user-pays
Financial planners contemplating taking the self-licensed route can expect to pay more the privilege under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) user-pays regime being contemplated by the Government.
The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer has released the consultation paper outlining the proposed fee for service approach which will apply to ASIC, and it reveals that financial planners will be amongst those facing higher costs depending on what they intend to do.
According to the consultation paper released by O’Dwyer, ASIC is aiming to charge what it claims it actually costs with respect to processing licensing applications.
It said ASIC was “proposing to cost some licence applications at a more granular level (through tiering), which more closely aligns the fee being charged to the regulatory effort involved in assessing the application”.
It said this recognised stakeholder feedback that costing both full and limited licence applications at the same set fee might be a potential hindrance to encouraging entities from applying for a limited licence.
“The complexity relating to AFS licence applications will be determined dependent on client type and the services and products selected when applying,” it said.
The proposed fee schedule outlined in the ASIC consultation paper would see low-level complexity individual retail license applications costed at $3,349 while highly complexity retail individual applications would be costed at $7,537.
Retail body corporate complex applications were costed at $11,305.
Stakeholders have until 15 December to respond to the consultation paper.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
