Planner fee structures encourage closet indexing: study
Financial advisers' fee structures abet "closet indexing" by fund managers, creating a clear conflict of interest between planners' earnings and their clients' best interests.
Such is the verdict of a Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR) study, which found clients on the verge of retirement were too heavily orientated towards growth assets.
It linked the trend to the nature of planners' fees and said the findings support the banning of commissions from product providers.
However, it did not advocate the complete removal of asset-based fees.
"Asset-based fees still hold value," Professor Geoffrey Kingston from Macquarie University who led the CIFR-funded study said.
"The optimal investment strategy allows for both fee structures where income-generating assets are exposed to low risk and the remaining assets incorporate both a fixed fee and a fulcrum-style performance fee to discourage closet indexing."
Professor Kingston said the study found financial plans were "too fragile" around retirement, with inadequate disclosure of the risk.
He said Statements of Advice should be required to disclose the percentage of the planner's allocation to interest bearing securities with high credit ratings.
Recommended for you
As reports flow in of investors lining up to buy gold at Sydney’s ABC Bullion store this week, two financial advisers have cautioned against succumbing to the hype as gold prices hit shaky ground.
After three weeks of struggling gains, this week has marked a return to strong growth for adviser numbers, in addition to three new licensees commencing.
ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice.
KPMG has revealed how much CEO and chief investment officers at Australian family offices are earning, both in salary and bonus, and how they compare to international peers.
