Planner education certification seen as key

"financial-planning"/

18 January 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Canadian financial planning industry has been facing many of the same problems as its Australian counterpart, with the major financial planning organisations similarly pursuing the implementation of legislative restrictions on who can use the designations "financial planner" and "financial adviser".

The issue has been revealed in a recent Canadian Financial Planning Standards Council submission to the Ontario Expert Committee's Consultation on Financial Advisory and Financial Planning Policy Alternatives which points to "the gap that currently exists as a result of the absence of a single set of mandated standards and common oversight for those who claim, either through title or advertising, to be financial planners or to offer financial planning as a core service".

Further it said much of the consumer and marketplace confusion was rooted in the interchangeable use of "financial planner" and "financial advisor".

"The terms ‘financial planning', ‘financial planner' and ‘financial plan' are generally well‐defined and specific in nature, while the terms ‘financial advice' and ‘financial advisor' are broadly‐used, generic and non‐specific," the submission said.

It said the term "financial planner" was one of the most commonly misused titles in the financial services industry and represented a title which projected "a professional image that may lead a consumer to believe that the person using it is qualified to provide financial planning when in fact they may not be."

"To garner trust and increase consumer protection and well‐being, Ontarians must be able to count on self‐explanatory titles that clearly describe the services being offered, and be assured that the title corresponds with the appropriate qualifications, competencies and services of that particular role," the submission said.

It said that while there might be several appropriate, distinct titles and services within the broader "financial advisor" space, it was proposing that the government start with the most discrete identifiable group—financial planners.

"The most effective, practical and least cumbersome solution to addressing financial planner regulation (or ultimately that of other financial advisors) lies in professional certification," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

6 days 5 hours ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 4 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND