Picking technology crash pays dividends

cent/fund-managers/chief-investment-officer/fund-manager/

Selling short has been the key to Platinum Asset Management’s winning performance in 2000, says investor services manager Liz Norman.

"Essentially, one of the primary reasons for good performance was shorting individual companies," she says.

Platinum repositioned its portfolio in February last year and got out of many tech stocks before the bloodbath in April.

"By the time April came we didn't have a huge exposure (to tech stocks)," she says. "We had had a good run and were getting nervous, so it was time to move the portfolio."

Although the early departure left Platinum sacrificing some performance, the subsequent dip in tech stocks more than covered this position.

Just before the crash Platinum went against the global benchmark by having a low exposure to US stocks. Norman says some managers had up to 50 per cent of their portfolios in this area, whereas Platinum has very little, having shifted to Europe and Japan.

"We had 30 per cent of the portfolio in Europe and about 20 per cent in Japan, which was very different weighting to the MSCI Index," Norman says.

By the end of 2000, the fund manager had 34 per cent in Europe, 20 per cent in Japan, 19 per cent in North America and 5 per cent in emerging markets such as Korea. The remaining 22 per cent was in cash.

Emilio Gonzalez, chief investment officer of Perpetual Investments saw 2000 as a turning point for investors.

"Tech stocks came and went," he says. "Then there was the a hyperbole factor where prices went shooting ahead and a lot of investors questioned the value in some stocks."

Gonzalez says most fund managers had forecast a crash in the sector. The smart stuck to their advice, while the rest tried to go that extra metre, he says.

"There were a lot of managers who didn't manage the crash very well," he says.

"Then we had the shift back to basic, old economies versus new economies. Again, a lot of managers hadn't the experience to handle this."

Gonzalez says the fund managers with older heads did better as they taught the younger guys not to be so greedy.

"It was easy to go with the flow," he says.

Perpetual's success in 2000 was achieved by taking a long-term view of holding stocks, sometimes up to five years, says Gonzalez.

"By taking the longer picture, the best opportunities arise because the companies were often underpriced," he says.

"Today we are in a world where the good stock picker wins through."

International Equities

1. Platinum Asset Management

2. Credit Suisse Asset Management

3. Perpetual Investments

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

5 days 5 hours ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND