Perth advice practice pleads guilty to dishonest conduct

ASIC crime Perth

27 March 2023
| By Jasmine Siljic |
image
image image
expand image

Fong Financial Planners has pleaded guilty to three charges of dishonest conduct in the Perth Magistrates Court.

Whilst serving as an authorised representative of AMP in 2014, the advice firm acted dishonestly by recording false information on forms submitted to AMP as part of client insurance applications.

Fong Financial Planners intentionally withheld all relevant information relating to the personal circumstances of the clients, included health and medical details. 

If AMP had received this information from the firm, it could have requested further medical assessments and questionnaires, meaning exclusions could have applied to some of the insurance policies. 

The withheld information by Fong Financial Planners meant the duty of disclosure owed by the clients to the insurer had not been met and they carried the risk of not being covered by AMP.

The company and its director, former financial adviser David Fong, were initially charged with 11 offences contrary to the Corporations Act. The charges against Fong and eight of the charges against Fong Financial Planners were discontinued following Fong Financial Planners’ pleas of guilty to the three charges.

The maximum penalty for a company for engaging in dishonest conduct while providing financial advice and carrying on a financial services business was a fine of either $7,650,000 or three times the total value of the benefits reasonably attributable to the offence, or 10% of turnover in the 12-month period ending at the end of the month in which the offence was committed.

On 19 May, 2023, the matter was committed to the District Court of Western Australia for mention to fix a date for sentence. 

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions was prosecuting the matter, following a referral from Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by ChrisC123 on Mon, 2023-03-27 12:33

What an absolutely ridiculous level of fines - $7.65 million.
What was the fine for Rio Tinto blasting a historic aboriginal site to smithereens? Nothing.
What was the fine for Rio Tinto dropping radioactive material along the highway? $2,000
What's the fine for driving drunk and killing/maiming someone - not a lot.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 day 13 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

2 weeks 4 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS