Is the PC’s vertical integration definition too narrow?

FSC/productivity-commission/vertical-integration/

29 March 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has welcomed the Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) finding that vertical integration is “not a problem in and of itself” but has urged consideration be given to broadening its definition to better reflect the range of relationships it covers in practice.

In its submission to the PC Competition in the Australian Financial System inquiry, the FSC criticised the Commission’s draft report for taking “a very narrow view of vertical integration as it only focusses on [authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs)] owning advice licensees”.

In practice though, the Council said that the industry considered vertical integration to cover “many different forms” of relationships “between suppliers of financial products and services in at least two different stages of production”.

Many of these would not be covered by the PC’s strict definition.

The FSC used its submission to call on the Commission to “widen its consideration to all types of vertically integrated structures, to ensure its findings and recommendations are appropriate to all such structures”.

“Even if the PC believes that the focus should only be limited to relationships existing within the financial advice sector, this broader scope is essential,” the submission said.

“It is important that the PC understand the variety of vertically integrated business models within the financial services sector so that it can consider the impact of recommendations across all models, ensuring no unintended consequences arise.”

The Council agreed with the PC’s broader findings of the benefits of vertically integrated arrangements for consumers.

“With adequate reporting, the right regulatory levers, and regulators using those levers as necessary … the benefits of vertical integration to consumers should far outweigh the perceived shortcomings.

“Where competition is strong, integration may lead to efficiencies being passed on to the customer in the form of lower prices and/or increased product choice,” the submission said.

The Council believed that large vertically aligned institutions may be more willing to invest in product innovation and enhanced service offerings, both of which would benefit customers.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 day 17 hours ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

6 days 16 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND