Parliamentary Inquiry being questioned
The value of a Parliamentary Inquiry, the terms of reference of which appear to favour retail superannuation funds over their industry counterparts, is being questioned by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
ASFA chief executive Philippa Smith said she found the calling of the inquiry, to be chaired by South Australian Liberal Senator Grant Chapman, puzzling in circumstances where most of the issues had already been extensively reviewed by other inquiries.
“The terms of reference for the inquiry seem somewhat odd when most of the issues have been dealt with elsewhere,” she said. “It represents a distraction when you consider that most funds are trying to bed down the changes announced in the Budget.”
The Parliamentary Inquiry has caused consternation in some quarters of the superannuation industry because its chairman, Senator Chapman, in 2004 used parliamentary privilege to accuse leading industry superannuation funds organisation Industry Fund Services (IFS) of a range of failings, including poor accounting standards and a lack of transparency — claims strenuously denied by IFS.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
