Parliamentary Inquiry being questioned
The value of a Parliamentary Inquiry, the terms of reference of which appear to favour retail superannuation funds over their industry counterparts, is being questioned by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
ASFA chief executive Philippa Smith said she found the calling of the inquiry, to be chaired by South Australian Liberal Senator Grant Chapman, puzzling in circumstances where most of the issues had already been extensively reviewed by other inquiries.
“The terms of reference for the inquiry seem somewhat odd when most of the issues have been dealt with elsewhere,” she said. “It represents a distraction when you consider that most funds are trying to bed down the changes announced in the Budget.”
The Parliamentary Inquiry has caused consternation in some quarters of the superannuation industry because its chairman, Senator Chapman, in 2004 used parliamentary privilege to accuse leading industry superannuation funds organisation Industry Fund Services (IFS) of a range of failings, including poor accounting standards and a lack of transparency — claims strenuously denied by IFS.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
