Parliamentarian references adviser fears of ASIC retribution

FPA AFA ASIC Jason Falinksi financial planning FASEA Dante De Gori phil anderson CPD AFSL

30 June 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

A member of a key Parliamentary Committee has asked the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) whether advisers have stopped short of challenging the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) because of fear of regulatory retribution. 

NSW Liberal back-bencher, Jason Falinksi asked the question during a hearing of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics and said that had been the feed-back he had received from some constituents. 

He also asked whether mental health issues had been generated by adviser concerns. 

Both the FPA and AFA said that the financial planning industry is as at tipping point with around 6000 advisers having left the industry and only around 51 graduates having entered in the first half of 2020. 

The FPA and AFA also made clear that there were continuing issues with the operation of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime, not least Standard 3. 

FPA chief executive, Dante De Gori said that his organisation’s members were broadly supportive of the objective of the FASEA regime but were concerned about the manner in which that regime had been implemented by FASEA itself. 

AFA general manager, policy and professionalism, Phil Anderson said that his organisation’s members were concerned that FASEA had not addressed the value of prior learning and continuing professional development (CPD) and the manner in which this had impacted the future of older, highly experienced financial advisers. 

Both the AFA and FPA said that the level of regulation being imposed on the industry was making the cost of delivering advice cost-prohibitive and that this was occurring at a time when, faced with COVID-19, clients badly needed access to advice. 

FPA chair, Marissa Broome pointed to the rising costs confronting financial advisers, noting that she was a practicing financial planner holding her own Australian Financial Services License and had seen compliance costs rise ten-fold. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS