Opposition warned on negative gearing changes
Labor's proposed policy changes to negative gearing are based on inadequate economic modelling and should not be changed in isolation without a comprehensive review of the taxation policy.
That was the call from the peak body of the property industry, the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA), which said $6.5 trillion worth of Australians' wealth was in property, which was around three times the amount held in superannuation and equities.
The body's chair, Ben Kingsley, said: "Don't play with this unless you know what you're doing. Such major reform requires comprehensive and detailed modelling. Until there is real evidence to support such a policy, which industry experience tells us doesn't exist, the opposition should be very careful about changing negative gearing and capital gains tax provisions".
Kingsley said property investment contributed to self-sufficient retirees and reduced reliance on the Government to support an ageing population, while also providing one in four jobs.
"Labor's proposed removal of negative gearing on established housing is a poorly-informed policy that will drive property price reductions, increase rents, stifle new property construction, rather than encourage it and cause job losses.
"Is that a good policy?" he asked.
Tax agency business, H&R Block, pointed to Australian Taxation Office (ATO) figures in February, which showed that 72 per cent of investors with negatively geared properties earned $80,000 or less (2011-12 figures), and argued the removal of negative gearing would hit many middle income families who would have to sell their property as their tax bills rose.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.