Opposition warned on negative gearing changes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e84df/e84df31ba24338d80af55ff7fe10c6150f344204" alt="inadequate changes image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e84df/e84df31ba24338d80af55ff7fe10c6150f344204" alt="inadequate changes image"
Labor's proposed policy changes to negative gearing are based on inadequate economic modelling and should not be changed in isolation without a comprehensive review of the taxation policy.
That was the call from the peak body of the property industry, the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA), which said $6.5 trillion worth of Australians' wealth was in property, which was around three times the amount held in superannuation and equities.
The body's chair, Ben Kingsley, said: "Don't play with this unless you know what you're doing. Such major reform requires comprehensive and detailed modelling. Until there is real evidence to support such a policy, which industry experience tells us doesn't exist, the opposition should be very careful about changing negative gearing and capital gains tax provisions".
Kingsley said property investment contributed to self-sufficient retirees and reduced reliance on the Government to support an ageing population, while also providing one in four jobs.
"Labor's proposed removal of negative gearing on established housing is a poorly-informed policy that will drive property price reductions, increase rents, stifle new property construction, rather than encourage it and cause job losses.
"Is that a good policy?" he asked.
Tax agency business, H&R Block, pointed to Australian Taxation Office (ATO) figures in February, which showed that 72 per cent of investors with negatively geared properties earned $80,000 or less (2011-12 figures), and argued the removal of negative gearing would hit many middle income families who would have to sell their property as their tax bills rose.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.