Ombudsman has few qualms with advisers
A new report by the banking sector’s chief complaints body has found the number of disputes involving bank-based financial planners remains relatively low, despite a steady increase compared to previous years.
While the Banking and Financial Services Ombudsman handles only a small proportion of the total disputes between advisers and their clients, its annual report shows 46 separate complaints about bank-based planners were registered over the past year. This compared to 21 the previous year and only 11 the year before that.
The rise came in a year when the total number of disputes handled by the Ombudsman fell 15.5 per cent.
However, Ombudsman Colin Neave said the rise did not automatically imply a drop in the standard of bank-based planners.
“We certainly did not notice a drop in the standard of advice compared to previous years in the cases we looked at,” he said.
Most of the disputes referred to the Ombudsman related to credit cards, housing loans and savings accounts.
Disputes involving bank-based advisers are handled by the Ombudsman if they also involve some advice on consumer banking products, such as home loans. Other financial planning related complaints are generally handled by the Finance Industry Complaints Service.
Financial Planning Association chair-elect Kathryn Greiner defended the reputation of financial advisers.
“I doubt if the figures indicate a drop in quality in the giving of advice,” she said.
“I think it is a case of the public becoming more aware. When they are not happy, they are much more aware of where they can go to lodge their complaint.”
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
