Older homeowners prefer to stay put
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c350/1c3503e26567e82aa7e6608192357f35997486fd" alt="family house image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c350/1c3503e26567e82aa7e6608192357f35997486fd" alt="family house image"
Despite the Federal Government’s downsizer initiative, retirement-age Australian home owners are unlikely to move out of the family home unless they have to, usually due to health reasons.
Research from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) Moving, downsizing and housing equity consumption choices of older Australians was undertaken by AHURI research from the University of Sydney to understand who downsized and why.
Around 65% of home owners aged 65-71 in 2001 were still living in their original residence in 2016, while older renters were more likely to move as less than half were living in the same dwelling in that same timeframe.
From 1 July 2018, homeowners over the age of 65 could contribute up to $300,000 extra into their super from the sale of their home to help ‘downsize’ into a dwelling better fitted for retirement while boosting retirement savings.
Stephen Whelan, Associate Professor from the University of Sydney, said the research showed Australian’s were still reluctant to downsize or spend their housing wealth in retirement.
“When such transitions do occur, they tend to be associated with key life events that are not induced by or associated with policy settings; for example, health shocks that require a move into aged care; retiring from the workforce or the death of a partner,” Whelan said.
By the time they were 80, 12.26% of Australians were living in a nursing home, which was up from 2.92% of those aged 75-80.
The research also showed Australians aged 55-64 were as likely to be home owners as their older counterparts in retirement but were less likely to own their home outright and had less equity.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.