Offshore super unfairly slugged

taxation superannuation funds retirement savings capital gains

29 July 2002
| By Jason |

The Senate Select Committee on Superannuation has reported its findings stating that the current system for taxing transfers from foreign superannuation was too heavy and prevented many people from bringing their retirement savings into the country.

The report says this result goes against the stated aims of superannuation in Australia which was to promote the private accumulation of savings in Australia to fund retirement incomes.

The findings were handed to the President of the Senate, Margaret Reid, on Thursday by the chair of the committee Senator John Watson who said that the system should promote savings but tax rates were prohibitive and current arrangements were difficult and unfair for those who wish to transfer funds.

Watson also said this lack of new funds had further impacts as domestic investment markets were being unable to access funds that could be used in the wider Australian economy.

As part of dealing with the problem the Committee made a number of recommendations including taxing foreign superannuation monies at a rate that generally applies to the earnings of the Australian regulated fund into which the funds have been transferred, instead of the individual’s marginal tax rate, which is usually higher.

The Committee was also critical of the time period in which recent migrants are given to ensure their superannuation can be transferred tax free and said that the period was not long enough to encourage migrants to transfer the funds.

As such it has recommended that the time frame be extended from six months to two years.

CPA Australiahas endorsed both recommendations saying they were in keeping with the accountancy body’s submission to the Committee.

In its submission CPA Australia called for a tax limit either based on capital gains tax provisions of 10 per cent or a superannuation contribution at 15 per cent for superannuation funds transferred from offshore.

The accountancy body also said the potential for double taxation should be removed and where the transfer of funds is made to a resident superannuation fund, the liability for the tax should be passed to the super fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 days 18 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS