Oakeshott's opt-in comments welcomed
Recent comments by independent MP Rob Oakeshott that he does not support Labor’s proposed two-year opt-in arrangements have been welcomed by both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Opposition.
The FPA said it hoped Oakeshott’s comments would lead the Government to reconsider the proposal, stating that it would continue to talk with the Government, Opposition and independents to further refine the reforms prior to the legislation being drafted.
“We have strongly lobbied against legislating an opt-in requirement and the unintended consequences that it could cause,” said FPA chief executive Mark Rantall (pictured).
The FPA believed the abolition of these and the implementation of fiduciary duty would make any opt-in requirement excessive and obsolete, he said.
“No financial services profession in the world has a legislated opt-in, and the problem it was designed to fix has been addressed,” he said.
Shadow Financial Services Minister Mathias Cormann also welcomed the comments, and described opt-in as bad policy that would add unnecessary red tape and increase costs for both small business financial advisers and their clients.
Cormann also said the policy would be made redundant by other changes including fiduciary duty, and added that Treasury estimates an average small business advisory firm would face $50,000 in additional costs each year under opt-in.
“These additional costs would have a significant impact on smaller and regional financial advisory practices limiting availability, accessibility and affordability of high quality advice to consumers,” Cormann said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
