Not all fin services companies need AFS licences: lawyer
Financial services firms concerned about compliance may be better off sharing a licence with other parts of the business, a specialist lawyer says.
While many businesses offering financial services may believe they need their own Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence, this is not necessarily the case, according to The Fold’s senior lawyer, Jaime Lumsden Kelly.
Firms can elect to each carry their own licence or choose one entity to hold the licence and appoint other parts of the business authorised representatives, she said.
“The thing to consider with (the latter) option is which company should hold the licence,” Lumsden Kelly says.
“A holding company that does not itself provide financial services may be a good choice, but it’s not the only alternative.
“When making a decision, you need to be mindful of the fact that the entity that holds the licence will need to undertake monthly cash flow forecasts. They also need to obtain all the authorisations needed for all the financial services offered throughout the group.”
Lumsden Kelly said AFS licences can be a complicated area and companies who are confused should seek legal advice.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
