No uniform approach to address liquidity
Different mortgage fund managers use different tactics to address liquidity issues, and a uniform approach has not been seen yet, according to Standard & Poor’s Fund Services (S&P) analyst Peter Ward.
Ward said S&P considered this to be a reflection of the different underlying investor base, underlying investments, and different managers’ mortgage fund sector outlook.
“Three funds, managed by Australian Unity, Challenger and OnePath have changed their redemption mechanisms. Each solution has provided improved certainty, but outcomes differ,” Ward said.
“The changes have contributed to our decisions to upgrade the Australian Unity fund to three stars from two stars and to resolve the long-standing ‘on-hold’ ratings for Challenger and OnePath funds,” Ward added.
His comments followed the release of S&P Australian Fixed Interest – Mortgages sector review as part of which the researcher rated nine mortgage fund products.
The funds included six conventional mortgage funds, two hybrid funds and one high-yield mortgage fund in the rated peer group.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
