No room for RBA in regulatory mix – IFSA
Richard Gilbert
This week’s unprecedented Reserve Bank commentary on financial planning fee structures and superannuation fund comparisons has drawn a heated response from the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA).
IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert has expressed deep concern at the comments made by RBA deputy governor Ric Battellino in circumstances in which he said there are already two Commonwealth regulators in the financial services space — the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
He said that there was a need for clarity with respect to regulatory jurisdiction and this was something that was not being assisted by the comments made by Battellino.
Battellino earlier this week used an address to a finance and banking industry conference to discuss the impact of fees and charges on the relative returns provided by retail and industry funds.
He said that while it was difficult to isolate the exact cause of the underperformance of retail funds, an important contributing factor would have been that fees and expenses on retail funds were typically higher than for industry and corporate funds.
Gilbert said that the comments had been unhelpful in the context of the clearly defined regulatory roles within the Australian financial services industry.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
