New rules on financial blogging
Internet sites that foster discussion and comment on financial services products are likely to find themselves being more closely scrutinised by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
The regulator has released a discussion paper in which it proposes to update its approach to so-called Internet Discussion Sites (IDS) and will make clear whether it believes the operators of such sites will need an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).
In releasing the discussion paper, ASIC made clear that it did not propose to grant IDS operators relief from the financial services licensing and disclosure regimes, meaning that operators would need to hold an AFSL unless a pre-existing exemption applied to them.
ASIC has fleshed out its position in the discussion paper, pointing out that whether the operator of an IDS is providing financial product advice will depend on their involvement in the postings.
"For example, an operator who is very much involved in the content of the IDS by making postings may be providing financial product advice," the discussion paper said.
"If this is the case, we consider that the operator's conduct in operating the IDS and providing financial product advice may constitute the carrying on of a financial services business."
It said that operators who did not post comments containing financial product advice themselves, but who authorised or arranged for others to post such comments might also require a licence.
It said this was because authorising or arranging for a thing to be done was generally treated in the same way as actually doing it, under the Corporations Act.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
