New policies to shake up dividends in 2020
New regulators’ policies aimed at encouraging firms to retain capital combined with lower earnings across many sectors may have far-reaching implications for retirees as well as companies and investment managers, according to a Realindex study.
The research looked at how central banks and regulators have initiated policies to constrain dividend payments by financial institutions.
Further to that, Realindex’s modelling suggested that 60% of the ASX 200 benchmark’s total return was due to dividends and for financials, that rises to more than 70% of the total return (including dividends and buybacks).
According to David Walsh, Realindex’s head of investments, moves to limit dividends could both reduce investor incomes and affect valuations.
“We know that dividend payments are an important component of returns to shareholders, especially retirees. They are also the chief source of franking credits in Australia, and so they are a key part of the attraction for investors,” he commented.
“The potential enforced cancellation of dividends for certain financial institutions will not only reduce the income investors are expecting, they will likely look to move capital to companies that do pay dividends. This could drive up the prices of stocks such as Telstra, Wesfarmers or Coles.”
At the end of April, the weighted average consensus of dividend per shares downgrades was -25% for Australia and -17.3% globally, with downward revisions led by energy, transport and banks.
“The extent of dividend cancellation or withdrawal is not clear yet, but many dividend forecast downgrades have already appeared in analyst forecasts and there are some sectors that look quite at-risk,” Walsh said.
Additionally, Australia might be more severely impacted from COVID-19 than other developed markets as a decline in aggregate demand from China was likely to affect earnings in the materials sector, at least in the short term and, according to Realindex’ modelling, the retail segment of the real estate was especially at risk of distress.
Walsh stressed that dividends acted as a signalling mechanism for firms, with strong consistent dividend payout ratios and payments being a way for investors to understand the confidence that management had in the business.
In addition, companies that catered to the demands of investors by paying dividends could attract a premium for their shares.
“Significant changes to this behaviour could see changes in valuations going forward,” he said.
“A critical point is that it is not clear how long this change will continue for. If it is a temporary change, many investment processes and market and corporate behaviour will probably not move markedly when averaged over a longer period. However, if this represents a longer term change or permanent shift, then the implications may be very different. Only time will tell.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
