Negative gearing reforms to favour lower income investors
Negative gearing reforms can save the Australian Government more than $1.7 billion each year, a 57.3 per cent saving from the $3.04 billion cost of negative gearing deductions currently, without hurting lower income investors, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) research confirms.
The AHURI report, Income tax treatment of housing assets: an assessment of proposed reform arrangement, looked at reforms to negative gearing and capital gains tax (CGT) that would reduce the impact on everyday ‘mum and dad’ investors.
Key findings of the report included:
- Reforming rental deductions could provide greater tax concessions to ‘mum and dad’ investors and reduce the generous concessions that ‘sophisticated’ investors on higher income currently receive;
- A reduction in CGT discount has the potential to reduce inequality; and
- CGT reform could be gradual.
The research sought reforms that would have the least impact on investors with lower incomes, said author, Professor Alan Duncan, from the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre at Curtin University.
“Current negative gearing policies are heavily skewed towards high income earners, raising concerns about the extent to which these policies exacerbate income and wealth inequality in Australia,” said Duncan. “Our modelling suggests that a progressive rental deduction for investors cushions less wealth ‘mum and dad’ investors from significant drops in tax savings, and may be an appropriate policy option.”
Co-author, Professor Rachel Ong ViforJ, said reductions in CGT discounts would mean high income investors pay more tax than lower income investors, but that the reform would be “progressive in nature, reducing negative gearing tax savings by greater margins as tax assessable income increases”.
ViforJ said the changes would have to be worded carefully to ensure high income investors understand that the tax amount would represent a lower proportion of their take home income, and avoid the misconception that changes would have a proportionate impact on rental investors’ net incomes.
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
Australia has marked a decade among the best countries for retirement, according to Natixis, but with high inflation threatening their retirement goals, a third say they would get professional advice to improve their chances.
When it comes to the risks of acting as a responsible manager at an AFSL, compliance firm Holley Nethercote has shared a range of red flags that could see them facing disciplinary action from the corporate regulator.
Wealth management platform provider Netwealth has announced a partnership with FinClear to streamline trading capabilities for advisers.
