NAB/MLC relied on adviser attestations on fees


National Australia Bank and MLC were prepared to rely on “adviser attestations” that they had provided services to clients to enable the banking group to retain fees in the face of “fee for no service” concerns.
The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry heard from NAB’s chief customer officer, Michael Hagger that faced with “fee for no service” concerns from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) the banking group had gone looking for physical evidence of interactions between advisers and clients.
Under questioning from counsel assisting the Royal Commission, Michael Hodge QC, Hagger acknowledged that in order to retain fees the banking group had looked to see whether there was physical evidence of interaction between advisers and clients.
He also acknowledged that the banking group was prepared to seek adviser attestations as to whether or not the advisers had provided services to particular clients.
“And if they [the advisers] attested that they had provided the services, then you wouldn’t see a reason to repay the fees?” Hodge asked.
Hagger agreed that this was the case, but claimed that the adviser attestations would be subject to assurance.
However, Hagger also agreed with Hodge that in the absence of adviser attestations, the bank would be asking customers to attest that they had actually not received services.
Hagger said the NAB/MLC position was that if there was evidence that a service had not been provided, then the bank would refund the fees.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.