NAB insists fees for no service a “process issue”

NAB/national-australia-bank/Royal-Commission/RC/Banking-Royal-Commission/fees/fees-for-no-service/andrew-thorburn/Michael-Hodge/banking/financial-planning/mlc/financial-advice/commissions/compliance/remediation/

26 November 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

The National Australia Bank (NAB) chief executive, Andrew Thorburn, has defended some fees for no service charged by the bank as a “process issue” rather than dishonesty, as he came under fire from Counsel assisting the Commission, Michael Hodge SC, at the Royal Commission today.

“Dishonesty goes to intent and I don’t think I’ve seen this case and others where there was an intention to not do the right thing … I think it was wrong that we didn’t pick it up, and I think that we got onto it reasonably quickly,” Thorburn said, when drilled by Hodge on the bank’s former practice of retaining fees when clients were transferred to MLC.

He admitted that NAB did not have the right checks and balances in place, but said that the bulk transfers that occurred were “quite manual” and done without that intent.

“It wasn’t 'let’s do it and see if we can get away with it' … it wasn’t that at all, it was a process issue,” he said, adding that when a complaint was made they acted “reasonable quickly” on it.

Thorburn also faced questioning on the commissions paid by the bank, with Hodge suggesting that commissions made to advisers sending clients to the bank for loans or other services were paid first and foremost in the clients’ interests.

“It seems like the main benefit to you rather than the customer, that is what you obtain is having one of these professionals effectively offer either explicitly or implicitly their endorsement to the customer of going to NAB,” the senior counsel said.

Thorburn disagreed: “It’s really just an opening of a door … it’s like anybody, one person recommending something to someone else. So I really do believe it’s a benefit for the customer, for convenience and speed and confidence, in seeing somebody who is endorsed by somebody who they respect.”

When asked why NAB would need to pay advisers if the recommendation was done in line with their professional duties, Thorburn said that while they often were not paid, he believed that in some cases it was justified.

“When you have a business where the nature of what they do is financial matters, and we have said that it’s important that that’s incidental or supplementary to their business, we still think it’s a legitimate commercial transaction to pay the referrer,” he said.

“Now, you’re pushing into some risk in this and I agree … but I think we’ve really constrained it for the moment and we’ve got some better controls happening.”

Hodge also asked the CEO whether NAB’s announcement that it would let 6,000 employees go last year would come at a cost to compliance and remediation, to which Thorburn insisted it should now as compliance was already getting more investment than it had before.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 months 3 weeks ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

1 week 1 day ago

The exit of co-CIOs Andrew Clifford and Clay Smolinski from Platinum has highlighted key person risk, with Morningstar raising its outflow forecast to 33 per cent of FUM ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS