Morningstar reduces its exposure to Australian shares
Morningstar has cut its tactical asset allocation to Australian equities from 24 to 22 per cent following the results of its latest expert asset allocation panel review.
The research provider stated that the panelists were less confident about growth assets continuing to outperform defensive investments and were concerned that investor sentiment had shifted from "fearing the worst to being surprised" by the current economic outlook.
In its economic update for the April/May period, Morningstar stated that the outlooks for the Australian economy and share market appear less positive than was previously the case.
The report stated that one of the main concerns for the panel was the ramifications of the nation's "two-speed economy".
While the resources trade boom had up until recently been quite robust, it was now "wobbly at the margin", a panel member said.
In light of Australia's high exposure to international shocks, the restrained domestic economy and relatively expensive share valuations, Morningstar also increased its defensive assets exposure by upping its international fixed interest allocation from 6 per cent in January 2012 to 8 per cent in April.
Furthermore, Morningstar's review said that the panel was "considerably warmer to the idea of corporate debt".
"You are being paid adequate compensation for corporate credit," a panellist said.
"Yields have come in a long way to something like fair value, they're certainly not expensive."
Recommended for you
As the year draws to a close, a new report has explored the key trends and areas of focus for financial advisers over the last 12 months.
Assured Support explores five tips to help financial advisers embed compliance into the heart of their business, with 2025 set to see further regulatory change.
David Sipina has been sentenced to three years under an intensive correction order for his role in the unlicensed Courtenay House financial services.
As AFSLs endeavour to meet their breach reporting obligations, a legal expert has emphasised why robust documentation will prove fruitful, particularly in the face of potential regulatory investigations.
