More youth urged for super boards
Superannuation funds may need to start looking at a younger demographic to fill their trustee ranks.
That is the bottom line of new research commissioned by the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), which found that while trustee directors are overwhelmingly confident that their funds are well governed, they need to address the question of board succession planning.
The research, released at today’s AIST Fund Governance Conference in Melbourne, was based on a survey conducted over two periods from April to December 2008 and involved more than 150 trustee directors and the chief executives of 28 funds.
Commenting on the survey results, AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said it suggested that Australians who had their superannuation invested in not-for-profit funds could be confident that their money was being managed by well-educated trustee directors who were passionate and highly committed.
However, she said the survey had pointed to the need for improved succession planning on boards.
“In the same way that the rest of Australia is wrestling with the challenges of an ageing population, superannuation fund boards — much like corporate boards — face a similar hurdle, with more than 76 per cent of trustees on super boards aged over 50 and most of them male,” Reynolds said.
She said this suggested the superannuation industry needed to ensure the pathways were in place to encourage young people and more women to join super boards.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.