More Storm action brewing
A law firm representing former clients of Storm Financial has foreshadowed legal proceedings against Macquarie Bank and Bank of Queensland, irrespective of any announcement released by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with respect to agreements reached on behalf of Storm investors.
At the same time the law firm, Levitt Robinson Solicitors, has released 2007 documentation between ASIC and Storm Financial’s lawyers which suggests that the regulator held concerns about the financial planning company’s practices at that point in time.
The law firm has suggested that the document is sufficient to have clients ask themselves whether ASIC “let things go from November 2007 to December 2008 or even beyond”.
It claimed that in such circumstances clients needed to question whether ASIC could appropriately represent their interests in negotiating with the banks.
“We very much apprehend that we will need to negotiate on your behalf to attempt to cut a better deal for our clients, whatever is announced by ASIC,” the Levitt Robinson letter said.
The law firm’s correspondence also suggests that Storm clients found themselves “the victims of the banks’ urgent need to shore up their own positions” with respect to liquidity and margin loans.
“They had a liquidity crisis and your assets had to be liquidated to help them out,” the correspondence said.
The letter claims that, on such a basis, the law firm did not believe any action brought by ASIC against the banks would be fought without fear or favour.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
