More smaller practices looking to sell

commissions/compliance/financial-planning-businesses/financial-advice-reforms/financial-advisers/future-of-financial-advice/government/

8 June 2010
| By Caroline Munro |
image
image
expand image

Radar Results has seen a dramatic increase in the number of financial planning businesses looking to sell.

Managing director John Birt said the consultancy firm currently had 85 businesses on its books seriously looking to sell, which he said was a fair jump from the 50 the firm had in December.

Birt said it was the highest number of sellers Radar Results had ever had, adding that enquiries from people looking to sell had definitely increased since the Future of Financial Advice reforms were announced late in April. Most enquiries were from smaller practices that operated with trail commissions.

“Over the last six or seven weeks, we have probably had between 15 and 20 trail businesses approaching us to sell. That’s an indication of what the proposed legislation is going to do to smaller businesses,” said Birt.

Birt said part of the reason for selling might also lie in the increased penalties for negligent advice — whether the negligence was intentional or not.

He said the reforms would place fiduciary duties and obligations on financial advisers that were similar to those on company directors, and which could carry the same penalties for breaches (such as hefty fines or imprisonment).

Birt conceded that if smaller planners felt they would no longer be able to cope with compliance it could motivate them to leave or retire early.

“The Government is going to be a lot more severe on financial planners who do not do the right thing, or maybe those who innocently provide negligent advice to the public,” he said.

Birt said the consequences of negligent advice might no longer be a case of paying a fine “and then it’s business as usual”.

“That’s what it’s been like for the last 25 years — not anymore. If the fiduciary obligations come in, which they will, and if you do something wrong under the Corporations Act the penalties can be very severe, and a lot more severe than they are now,” he said. “I would be concerned if I was an adviser who wasn’t that compliant.”

Referring to Bowen’s latest announcement that the ‘opt in’ for continuing advice requirements might be postponed for another two years after July 2012, Birt agreed that the Government had probably realised that it was a contentious issue that required a lot more discussion.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 days 1 hour ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND