More fees to pay for ASIC market supervision
The Government is seeking to raise around $18 million a year in new fees from those participating in Australia's equity markets to help fund the supervisory activities of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
In similar fashion to the manner in which superannuation and financial institutions levied to cover the costs of supervision by ASIC, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, and the Australian Taxation Office, the Government has announced a new cost recovery fee structure to be applied to stockbrokers and others utilising the Australian Securities Exchange and incoming Chi-X.
The move was announced by Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, who said the fees were expected to be offset by cost savings for the industry via reduced trading fees and narrower bid-ask spread.
"In addition, the economy as a whole will benefit from an innovative and competitive market lowering the cost of capital raising and creating investment opportunities," he said.
Shorten said opening Australia's financial markets to competition carried the challenge of supervising multiple markets in an environment of high speed and complex trading.
"The proposed market supervision fee model and cost recovery arrangements represent an important next step in our efforts to support competitive, efficient and innovative equity markets," he said.
Shorten said the proposed market supervision fee model and cost recovery arrangements would replace the current interim cost recovery arrangements from 1 January, next year.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.