More calls for legislation to distinguish 'strategy advice' from 'product advice' planners
Legislation is required to ensure consumers can distinguish between planners providing ‘independent strategy-driven advice’ and those providing ‘product sales-driven advice’, according to the Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group (BFPPG).
This was one of five recommendations submitted by the BFPPG to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services Inquiry into Financial Products and Services.
BFPPG president Claude Santucci said the consumer would be better served by “clear, legal definitions that make the distinction between institutionally owned, product sales-driven advice and independently owned, strategically-focused advice.
“Currently, it is very difficult for consumers to identify whether they are dealing with a financial product salesperson or an independent financial planner committed to putting their interests first.
“There is ample evidence that financial product salespeople hold themselves out to be independent in a misleading manner so as to make it easier to make a sale,” he said.
Another key BFPPG recommendation was that the Government should “encourage all stakeholders to help Australians achieve financial independence in their retirement by ensuring a level playing field in which the consumer benefits from competition, choice, and value for money”.
A number of initiatives were listed by the BFPPG to achieve this recommendation, including easing the compliance burden on planners, ensuring clients can move between platforms without incurring significant expense or a tax liability, and allowing a tax deduction for financial planning fees.
Yet another key recommendation was that a professional standards board (PSB) should be established to set the standards of behaviour, ethics and conduct of the profession, and that financial planners must be registered to the PSB and be required to adhere to its standards.
Education and competency standards would be transferred from the control of licensees to the PSB, and use of the term ‘financial planner’ would be restricted to those who are registered to the PSB.
This latter recommendation for a PSB mirrors a recommendation submitted individually to the inquiry by BFPPG board member Bruce Baker earlier this week, and reported by Money Management.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
