Money Managers win “independence” ruckus

commissions/

15 March 2001
| By Phil Macalister |

Money Managers has successfully won an appeal against an Advertising Standards Complaints Board decision on the use of the word "independence".

Last year the company complained to the board over a rival firm's use of the word in a newspaper advertisement.

That firm, Financial Vision, claimed to be independent because its portfolio monitoring service was charged purely on a fee basis. However, it said on its Web site that under its standard charging option, the company is able to receive "any brokerage that is payable from the placement of any insurance or investments".

Money Managers marketing manager Al Scott took exception to the ad, based on a 1997 ruling by the board against his firm. In that decision, the board said if a planning firm received any commissions, trailing commissions, soft dollar arrangements or benefits from product providers, which may tend to create a product bias, then the firm could not call itself independent.

In his appeal against the Financial Vision ad, Scott pointed out that Financial Vision provided customers with an option where it can take brokerage for any insurance or investment it places.

"This contradicts the statement made by the advertiser to the board," Scott said in his appeal.

He also asks if the board has "ascertained whether the company name under which they trade, Financial Vision, received brokerage, commission or trails."

In response to the appeal Financial Vision says it is independent because it doesn't receive any brokerage, commissions or trails.

However, it says the option shown on its Web site which refers to commissions and brokerages is no longer offered. Financial Vision also asked the board for a ruling on whether the information on its website constitutes advertising.

In its written decision the board said the content of the website did come within its jurisdication.

It said because the print advertisement referred to the website address, the contents of those web pages was relevant.

Because the site said Financial Vision did accept brokerage and commission, its print advertisement was in breach of the advertising code, it said

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 8 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo