Momentum grows on separating product from advice
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) will on Thursday seek to convince the Senate Committee reviewing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) of the value of a process capable of definitively separating financial advice from product sales.
Having cited the latest Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) action against Commonwealth Financial Planning and Financial Wisdom as something giving impetus to the FPA's moves, Rantall said he believed it was important that consumers were made fully aware of the differences between product sales and the provision of advice.
He said the FPA would therefore be putting forward a 10-point plan to the Senate Economic Committee to address the situation.
Money Management understands that the essence of the FPA's proposal is that the provision of financial product information should be regulated with consumers receiving a warning in the same terms that apply to the provision of general advice.
This approach would then build on the FPA's initial submission to the Senate Committee within which it said that such warnings "should make it clear that the information is not financial advice, it is information about a financial product or a class of financial products".
Rantall said that he also believed that the legal enshrinement of the term "financial planner/adviser" need to be central to the differentiating between those providing information relating to products and financial planners providing strategic financial advice.
The FPA has already argued within its submission that licensing and all the other forms of regulation which currently apply to general advice should apply to financial product information and that the term ‘financial planner/adviser' "should be defined by legislation, in order to prevent individuals who offer financial product information/factual information from representing themselves as financial planners or financial advisers".
Recommended for you
AZ NGA has entered into a strategic partnership with national advice firm MiQ Private Wealth, as a way to provide a succession solution, as well as career development opportunities for staff.
While the advice profession struggles under growing operating costs, Adviser Ratings has found more than half of practices – some 58 per cent – that generate less than $250,000 in revenue report no profit at all.
The Federal Court has ordered the freezing of assets and the appointment of receivers to two entities linked to Australian Fiduciaries, ASIC’s latest move in an ongoing investigation into the company’s managed investment schemes.
Off the back of the August adviser exam results, the profession has seen 17 new entrants hit the Financial Adviser Register (FAR) this week, helping numbers return to positive territory.
