Mixed report card for compliance consultants
|
|
Australian Financial Services Licensees (AFSLs) say that while some external compliance providers are excellent there are others that need to lift their game, and highlighted several major pitfalls that could be encountered when using external auditors.
Asked to comment on compliance issues, the licensees highlighted a lack of a common framework in the industry, a lack of accountability, a potential conflict of interest in the way reporting is carried out and a generic ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach.
“Some service providers find it inordinately difficult, if not impossible, to avoid compromising their judgment,” said Millenium3 head of advice and advocacy Sean Graham.
“It is incredibly tempting for some organisations [that] provide these services to tailor their reporting in a way that’s going to be more likely to generate future work.”
One licensee, who did not want to be named, questioned whether compliance companies provided value for the amount they charged, and might be simply looking to justify their fees.
Several licensees said that larger compliance providers had a tendency to be too generic in their approach, employing a ‘tick and flick’ mentality to rush through audits — a problem exacerbated by a lack of an agreed framework for exactly what needs to be achieved throughout the review process.
“There’s no industry standard, so most review processes come back to a review of statutory compliance, which can still dissatisfy clients,” Graham said.
Another problem with the industry overall was a lack of accountability when changes suggested by an external compliance provider were not implemented.
However, giving auditing responsibility to an external company might provide an objectivity that can be impossible to achieve when conducting work internally, several licensees suggested.
In many cases, the workload external auditors received from licensees was huge, and several larger AFSLs told Money Management that it would be impossible to meet all compliance requirements internally, or that it would place too much demand on their resources.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
