MFAA wants clarity on variations to credit contracts
The Mortgage and Finance Association of Australia (MFAA) is seeking clarity from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) regarding the circumstances by which responsible lending obligations apply to variations to credit contracts.
Under the 'National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009' (NCCP Act), increases to a credit contract automatically trigger responsible lending requirements, but if a borrower wishes to vary the terms of a loan, the requirement for disclosure documents will depend on individual circumstances.
The MFAA stated that it is currently seeking assistance from lenders regarding "where a variation to a credit contract is required by a borrower, this is preferable to a new contract which would require the broker to prepare a new preliminary credit assessment along with other disclosure documents".
If a new contract is drafted, then the lender's obligation to complete new disclosure documents will also apply.
The MFAA is lobbying lenders not to use new contracts where a consumer request is only for a variation, and for Treasury to amend the NCCP Act to state that if a variation is documented by a new contract, it is still a variation.
"However, where a variation to an existing credit contract is suggested as an alternative to a new credit contract (either with the same or different credit provider), it would be expected that responsible lending obligations for credit assistance would be triggered," the MFAA added.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
