Melbourne planner tells Shorten of opt-in impact
The proposed opt-in arrangement will negate the contracts created between financial planners and their clients, which could have a devastating effect on small financial planning practices.
That is the main point contained in a letter to Financial Services Minister Bill Shorten (pictured), written by a managing director of a small Melbourne financial planning practice.
In his letter, Raymond Costello of Rubicon Financial Services told Shorten about the effects the proposed opt-in arrangement would have on his practice.
The Federal Government had released a revised proposal as part of the Future of Financial Advice information pack, which sought that clients opt-in every two years instead of once a year, as previously announced.
Most of Rubicon’s income came from monthly advice and portfolio management fees payed by its clients – an ongoing arrangement which could be ended at any time by a client, according to Costello.
“Our clients and ourselves freely enter into a contract for the supply of services on an ongoing basis,” Costello wrote in his letter.
“The proposed opt-in requirement is a basic breach of our rights to enter into such a contract.”
The effect would be to destabilise the businesses of many small independent financial planners who depended on a consistent flow of advice fees to fund their practices, he wrote.
Costello asked Minister Shorten if any person with “public good in mind” would advocate opt-in for the compulsory superannuation system.
“We are entitled to assume that the most ardent advocates of the opt-in proposal, the industry super funds, think they will benefit,” the letter stated.
Costello asked the Government to craft an alternative proposal to the one announced and reconsider the current approach.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
