Mayfair 101’s Mawhinney sues ASIC for defamation
Mayfair 101 head, James Mawhinney, is suing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and deputy chair Sarah Court for defamation.
This followed publication of a media release stating Mawhinney had caused 500 investors to lose $211 million.
He is alleging Court provided quotes to the release stating:
- He knowingly misled the public by marketing high-risk products as low risk, and thereby caused 500 investors in the Mayfair 101 group to lose approximately $211 million;
- By reason of his serious misconduct in advertising investments, receiving or soliciting funds and misleading marketing, he caused 500 investors in the Mayfair 101 group to lose approximately $211 million; and
- By reason of his serious misconduct in advertising investments, receiving or soliciting funds and misleading marketing, he caused so much harm to investors in Mayfair 101, that, unless restrained by injunctions of the court while proceedings continue, he would cause further harm to investors.
He was also seeking claims for damages and aggravated damages arising from his reputation being “seriously injured” as well as for “distress and embarrassment” caused by the release.
The proceedings were filed in the Federal Court of Western Australia where Mawhinney resided.
Last month, Mawhinney successfully overturned a 20-year ban on him from advertising investments and raising funds from the public through financial products.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
