Managed accounts need to be in clients’ best interest: Lonsec
Financial advisers should picture themselves before the regulator when deciding whether to use in-house managed account products for clients, Lonsec believes.
The research house said while managed accounts had the potential to create significant efficiency gains and improve investment outcomes, they could risk creating a conflict trap that would put their entire business at risk.
Lonsec head of wealth management sales, Tony Nejasmic, said managed accounts needed to be done with the client’s best interest in mind and that would mean asking questions about an adviser’s investment capabilities, fee structure, and governance framework.
“The test is to picture yourself before the regulator and ask yourself if you have a clear justification for placing the majority of your clients’ funds in your own managed account products,” he said.
“If you’re unsure of the answer, then you’re likely not offering the best value for your clients and you’re likely not fulfilling your best interest duty.”
Lonsec said it was essential that managed accounts were used for efficiency purposes, did not involve additional fees, were free of perceived conflicts, and utilised professional investment managers for portfolio construction.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
