Make ongoing advice as affordable as a mobile phone

ASIC Steve Blizard mysuper

19 January 2021
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Ongoing financial advice support fees must become as low cost as a mobile phone with a five-year service support contract, according to a practicing financial adviser based in Western Australia.

The adviser has claimed that moving to a five yearly informed consent arrangements had the potential to see administrative costs across the industry fall from $28 million to only $5.6 million a year.

Utilising a submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) affordable advice review, Roxburgh Securities senior adviser, Steve Blizard has also called for the real of the financial advice opt-in requirements or, failing that, an amendment to make it less frequent.

“Annual opt-in creates extra red tape and forces advisers to only consider ongoing fee arrangements (OFAs with clients who are able to pay them enough so that they can deliver enough ongoing services to a client in a year to get them to actively opt-in,” his submission said.

And amid suggestions that ASIC is focused on scaled advice as a means of driving down advice costs, Blizard’s submission has attacked intra-fund advice claiming that most MySuper superannuation fund members had no idea “that they are paying over $100 million per annum in ongoing personal advice fees to 1,000 intra-fund personal financial advisers, none of whom are required to obtain annual renewals for their ongoing remuneration”.

“Intra-fund advice is being marketed as ‘free’, when in reality the fund member is paying for that advice through increased administration fees in their super fund,” Blizard’s submission claimed. “Some wealth super fund members take advantage of this cross-subsidised intrafund advice, subsidised by millions of other fund members, who never receive advice.”

He claimed that intra-fund adviser numbers had tripled over the past three years, whereas retail adviser numbers had fallen dramatically.

“Unaligned retail financial advisers now suffer an unlevel playing field, with default super fund product manufacturers and their intra-fund personal advisers permitted to manage any vertically integrated conflicts of interest, whereas, retail advisers are not,” Blizard’s submission said.

He said that collective fees should not be charged to default super fund members unless the fund trustee obtained annual consent for these advice fees charged from their fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS