Major planning groups in policy discussions


Australia’s major financial planning representative organisations have conducted high level informal talks around the construction of a united approach to issues arising out of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) affordable advice review.
The high level discussions have also occurred against the backdrop of the Financial Services Council (FSC) having earlier this month released its financial advice green paper which generated pushback from advisers about the involvement of the FSC in circumstances where it seen to largely represent product manufacturers rather than the advice industry.
Money Management understands that the informal discussions have occurred between the Financial Planning Association (FPA), the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA), the Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA) and the SMSF Association.
It represents the first significant coming together of the planning sector organisations since their failed pursuit of code-monitoring status under the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime.
A number of those involved in the talks said that there had been ongoing discourse between the organisations and that the genesis of the most recent meeting occurred “well in advance of the release of the FSC green paper”.
They said that the objective was to identify a common set of solutions for pursuit beyond whatever recommendations came out of the ASIC affordable advice review.
It was a case of seeking to have input into the legislative process which followed the ASIC review, particularly with respect to the future status of general advice and intra-fund advice.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.