Lobbying did not stall adviser education standards: ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has vehemently denied being swayed by lobbying groups to suspend its adviser competency push.
A media article this week alleged that a "confidential" letter from nine industry groups — including the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Financial Services Council (FSC) - encouraged the regulator to put its adviser education standards, laid out in consultation paper 212 and 215, on hold until the industry had time to address any changes in a holistic manner.
However, a spokesman for ASIC told Money Management there was no confidential letter, nor a pause on delivering standards due to lobbying.
"This letter was not a factor in ASIC's decision to put its work on CPs 212 and 215 on hold," he said.
Instead, he said the review of adviser competence announced by former Assistant Treasurer, Senator Arthur Sinodinos, was behind the decision to suspend CP 212.
"There are certain features of ASIC's preferred model to improve adviser training and competence (eg a mandatory national exam) that are best delivered through Parliamentary law reform," he said.
"In these circumstances it made sense for ASIC to put its review on hold pending Government consideration of the issue of adviser training and competence."
He also said ASIC published all submissions from industry groups on its website.
Recommended for you
Compared to four years ago when the divide between boutique and large licensees were largely equal, adviser movements have seen this trend shift in light of new licensees commencing.
As ongoing market uncertainty sees advisers look beyond traditional equity exposure, Fidante has found adviser interest in small caps and emerging markets for portfolio returns has almost doubled since April.
CoreData has shared the top areas of demand for cryptocurrency advice but finds investors are seeking advisers who actively invest in the asset themselves.
With regulators ‘raising the bar’ on retirement planning, Lonsec Research and Ratings has urged advisers to place greater focus on sequencing and longevity risk as they navigate clients through the shifting landscape.
