Lobbying did not stall adviser education standards: ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has vehemently denied being swayed by lobbying groups to suspend its adviser competency push.
A media article this week alleged that a "confidential" letter from nine industry groups — including the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Financial Services Council (FSC) - encouraged the regulator to put its adviser education standards, laid out in consultation paper 212 and 215, on hold until the industry had time to address any changes in a holistic manner.
However, a spokesman for ASIC told Money Management there was no confidential letter, nor a pause on delivering standards due to lobbying.
"This letter was not a factor in ASIC's decision to put its work on CPs 212 and 215 on hold," he said.
Instead, he said the review of adviser competence announced by former Assistant Treasurer, Senator Arthur Sinodinos, was behind the decision to suspend CP 212.
"There are certain features of ASIC's preferred model to improve adviser training and competence (eg a mandatory national exam) that are best delivered through Parliamentary law reform," he said.
"In these circumstances it made sense for ASIC to put its review on hold pending Government consideration of the issue of adviser training and competence."
He also said ASIC published all submissions from industry groups on its website.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
