Lifestyle investing flawed
A Griffith University academic has claimed that the so-called “lifecycle investing” strategy utilised by many superannuation funds is badly flawed.
Professor of Finance Michael Drew said that lifestyle investing had the potential to leave investors worse off in retirement than would be the case if they had pursued alternative strategies.
“The model works on the principle of adopting high risk strategies younger in life, then working towards the reverse closer towards retirement,” Drew said.
“The investments are put on autopilot, changing gears driven by age, with the promising of gliding in softly to land at retirement.”
However, he said the model did not take account of external factors such as the current market downturn.
Drew said that he and another Queensland academic, Dr Anup Basu had challenged the lifestyle investing approach based on more than 100 years’ of financial return data and found it to be potentially risky in terms of failing to meet the retirement saving goals of many investors.
“Selling when the market is low as it has been this year just because you’ve turned 45 doesn’t make sense,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
An advice AFSL has seen its licence cancelled by ASIC this month for failing to pay an AFCA determination, which was then covered by the CSLR.
The FAAA’s Phil Anderson believes the problem with Dixon Advisory is “much bigger than an advice issue” and the levy to pay for it should be expanded beyond the financial advice sector.
ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland says the problems regarding advisers recommending clients to invest in the troubled Shield Master Fund are far from being an “isolated incident”.
Advice professionals are being encouraged to proactively engage with their staff on mental wellbeing, with a new report finding a surge in employee exhaustion and stress over the past year.
