Lifestyle investing flawed
A Griffith University academic has claimed that the so-called “lifecycle investing” strategy utilised by many superannuation funds is badly flawed.
Professor of Finance Michael Drew said that lifestyle investing had the potential to leave investors worse off in retirement than would be the case if they had pursued alternative strategies.
“The model works on the principle of adopting high risk strategies younger in life, then working towards the reverse closer towards retirement,” Drew said.
“The investments are put on autopilot, changing gears driven by age, with the promising of gliding in softly to land at retirement.”
However, he said the model did not take account of external factors such as the current market downturn.
Drew said that he and another Queensland academic, Dr Anup Basu had challenged the lifestyle investing approach based on more than 100 years’ of financial return data and found it to be potentially risky in terms of failing to meet the retirement saving goals of many investors.
“Selling when the market is low as it has been this year just because you’ve turned 45 doesn’t make sense,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has announced it is selling off its Informed Investor subsidiary which it acquired in April 2022.
Wealth Data has examined which advice business model has seen the most growth since the start of the year including those that offer holistic advice.
Research conducted by Elixir Consulting and Lonsec has quantified the efficiency gains of using managed accounts in financial advice practices in hours per week saved.
With only one-quarter of advice practices actively seeking feedback from clients, the Financial Advice Association Australia has emphasised why this is a critical tool for client retention.
