LIF short-termism cost government

LICG LIF

20 July 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Election outcome illustrates that engaging in short-termism through policies like the Life Insurance Framework (LIF) is detrimental, a group of risk advisers believe.

The Life Insurance Consumer Group (LICG) welcomed news that a government had been formed, which meant there could be progress on LIF reform.

It reiterated its attack against the Financial Services Council (FSC), however, for proposing LIF reforms, arguing that it would benefit FSC members to the detriment of small business advisers.

"According to many years of media reports, FSC members have been responsible for major failings in the financial services industry. They have not been held to account by the FSC Board or Government, despite many enquiries," the group said.

"LIGC members hope that the imminent "Scrutiny of Financial Advice" (SOFA) enquiry will be effective."

The LICG called for the government to review the entire life insurance industry through SOFA before introducing the revised LIF.

"From the actions of the FSC, the idea is that all Australians should rely on insurance in super funds, get bank ‘advice', or go on-line to buy, or replace their policies with ‘cheaper' ones as encouraged by media," the group said.

It emphasised the need for independent advice that reviewed all available options in insurance distribution channels.

"Significant evidence shows systemic issues for consumers are insurer based, not adviser," the group said.

"Without advice, unsuspecting purchasers don't know what they are not getting from these distribution channels. Those unadvised options are more profitable for insurers."

The group said the LIF legislation should be evidence-based, consumer-centric, long-term policy that took all life insurance participants into account and was transparent.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS