Licensee volume bonuses not on FPA's agenda

FPA disclosure remuneration platforms fpa chief executive financial planning association financial services industry financial planners financial services association australian financial services australian securities and investments commission chief executive money management

11 June 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The payments made from financial services and product providers to Australian Financial Services Licensees (AFSLs) will not form part of the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) current review of remuneration practices in the industry.

The payments made by product providers and investment platforms — otherwise known as volume bonuses and shelf space fees — were questioned last week in a public submission to the parliamentary joint committee inquiry into financial products and services in Australia.

These payments appear to be passed on to financial planners in some cases, retained by licensees in others, or prepaid to licensees prior to volume targets having been met. Such payments are understood to be causing headaches for the administrators and receivers of recently collapsed management investment schemes.

In his submission to the inquiry, financial planner Neil Kendall called for platform rebates paid to financial services licensees to be banned. Kendall, managing director of boutique planning firm Tupicoffs, told the inquiry rebates from investment platforms were substantial, influenced investment dollar flows and were not properly disclosed to clients.

FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch confirmed to Money Management that the current review of remuneration practices in the financial services industry would focus on arrangements between financial planners and their clients, rather than tackling alternative remuneration (or soft dollar) arrangements, or the issue of volume bonuses being paid at a licensee level.

Bloch said at this point the FPA has chosen to “focus just on the remuneration paid by the client to the planner” and on the “relationship between the client and the planner and getting that right”.

The FPA and the Investment and Financial Services Association share a joint code on practices regarding the disclosure of soft dollar and rebate payments. Bloch believes that in recent years the industry has “moved a long way to cleaning up inappropriate practices, having good disclosure and changing behaviour”.

“Having said that, we’re aware a number of members have said we should be looking at those [issues] more closely,” Bloch said.

“We’re also aware that [the Australian Securities and Investments Commission] is looking at alternative remuneration, so we expect to be needing to have a look at both issues going forward, but I can’t really say when.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

18 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 6 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 5 days ago