Labor torpedos FSRA regulations
The financial services industry’s preparations for a move to the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) regime could be thrown into disarray after crucial new regulations were blocked in the Senate.
The Labor Party, with the support of the Democrats, successfully passed a motion to disallow the regulations last night, arguing they did not ensure the meaningful disclosure of fees and charges for consumers.
The regulations spell out how managed fund providers disclose fees and charges under the FSRA regime, including the calculation of the Ongoing Management Charge (OMC), a measure of the total impact of fees on superannuation products.
But the shadow minister for financial services, Labor Senator Stephen Conroy, says the OMC was a poor measure, which did not include entry and exit fees and did not demonstrate the full impact of fees on a superannuation member’s benefits.
“It is clear that the OMC is flawed and must be improved,” Conroy says.
In a speech to Parliament last night, Conroy also said the different disclosure requirements for superannuation as opposed to other managed investment products under the regulations was inconsistent with the aims of the FSRA.
“Everyone must understand that the purpose of the [FSRA] was to consistently and comprehensively protect consumers irrespective of the type of financial product or advise,” Conroy says.
But the parliamentary secretary to the treasurer, Liberal Senator Ian Campbell, says Labor’s move has created a regulatory vaccuum, leaving the financial services industry with no model for disclosure under the FSRA regime.
"Industry and consumers deserve legislative certainty to move effectively to the new regime. Labor has recklessly created a regulatory vacuum," he says.
Conroy said last night the Labor party was prepared to negotiate an outcome with the Government over the impasse.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
