KPIs proposed for ASIC, APRA and AUSTRAC

compliance "financial reporting" "funds management"

25 May 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Australia's financial services regulators would be performance-managed and held to key performance indicators (KPIs) under measures being actively canvassed by key financial services organisations.

The measures are aimed at ensuring that financial services organisations being levied to pay for the regulators can actually determine whether they are getting value for money.

The measures are revealed in an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) submission to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) dealing with measuring that organisation's outcomes.

It comes at a time when the Government has moved to lift the level of financial services levies and indicated moves towards making the funding of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) fully user-pays.

It is also being proposed that any measurement of the performance of the regulators be undertaken by an independent third party agency, possibly the Australian National Audit Office.

What has been made clear in the submission is that the superannuation funds represented by ASFA want to be sure that they are getting value for money and that they want not only the performance of AUSTRAC measured, but also that of ASIC and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

"It was the strong view of our members that the industry needs to be involved in the design of the survey," the submission said. "It was also felt that the surveys should be used to benchmark the relative performance of each regulator (APRA, ASIC and AUSTRAC) and that the survey findings should be publicly reported."

"In addition, there was concern raised by ASFA members around the need to maintain the confidentiality of the organisations participating in the survey of the regulators' performance," the submission said. "In particular, our members felt that the surveys should be conducted by an independent third party. That is, the surveys should not be conducted by the relevant regulator or Treasury."

It said that one possible suggestion was for the Auditor General's Department to conduct the surveys.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 days 21 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 week ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

3 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

6 days 1 hour ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

5 days 4 hours ago