Kaplan supports ASIC move away from education register

ASIC financial planning FPA AFA australian securities and investments commission association of financial advisers financial planning association

22 August 2013
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Financial services education provider Kaplan has come out in support of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) moving away from overseeing training and education, stating this was not the role of a corporate regulator. 

Earlier this week ASIC released Consultation Paper 215 (CP215) which stated ASIC would not continue in its role of overseeing financial services training and education nor continue the register of approved training courses. 

Kaplan Professional Education general manager Brian Knight said the training register had served its purpose in that licensees were now familiar with what courses and training providers meet the standards required under Regulatory Guide 146 (RG146).  

“It is our view that being on the ASIC register did not include any assessment that guaranteed the quality of training,” Knight said, adding that it was the role of educating regulators and education and training providers to assess courses against RG146. 

Knight said that after a number of years of mandatory education requirements, licensees are aware of which courses “are rigorous and effective in preparing advisers for the role and which ones are superficial and not thoroughly assessed”. 

He also said the removal of the register will measure the ability of licensees to recruit people who have completed reputable courses and put the onus on licensees to not rely on courses because they are on the training register. 

“There are still obviously providers who offer quick and easy training solutions, but licensees and industry associations are well aware of this and do not encourage prospects to complete them,” Knight said. 

While concerns have been raised by other participants in the education space that ASIC’s action will mean no courses will be audited to ensure they meet RG146 requirements, Knight said education and training providers are bound by strict requirements to maintain records and to provide evidence of completed courses. 

“We think associations such as the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and Financial Planning Association (FPA) can play an important role in recommending and approving robust and suitable training courses. We also have great confidence in the existing regulators which already regulate us.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 2 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS