Jury out on NAB compensation

APRA national australia bank disclosure wealth management business life insurance investments commission federal court

4 September 2003
| By Lucie Beaman |

By Lucie Beaman

Disadvantagedinvestors are not bound by a recent undertaking to industry regulators by the National Australia Bank to pay $67.2 million in compensation following product pricing errors, and will be able to pursue the matter further.

As part of the undertakings given to theAustralian Securities and Investments Commission(ASIC), theAustralian Prudential Regulation Authority(APRA) and the Federal Court, the National Group must distribute disclosure statements to all investors affected by unit price reductions that led to the debacle.

However, the undertakings, which relate to failings byNational Australia Financial Management(NAFM), National Australia Superannuation and MLC Nominees, will not obstruct independent legal action from investors, who will be notified of the compensation agreements by mail.

APRA general manager David Louis is confident the regulators have got “every penny back” from the financial giant, but does not rule out future investor action.

The actions are the result of NAFM’s failure to accurately measure the transaction cost component of unit pricings, and its announcement mid last year that approximately $60 million had been allocated from shareholder funds to compensate for the error.

The expected compensation was then further increased to just over $65 million earlier this year following an independent actuarial assessment by Trowbridge Deloitte.

In the undertakings, 235,000 investors in 21 superannuation and life insurance products will receive a total $67.2 million compensation by the end of this year.

As announced in August last year, $60.3 million will be paid to investors who suffered from unit price reductions following the integration of its wealth management business with MLC, while a further $6.9 million will be paid to investors after the investigations led to the discovery of historical errors in unit pricing by NAFM over the last decade.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS