Judge slams IOOF witnesses over unsatisfactory evidence

IOOF chief financial officer chairman director

6 November 2003
| By Craig Phillips |

IOOFhas been denounced in a recent Supreme Court ruling after the presiding Judge considered its case plagued with “inconsistencies” and that “virtually every witness was open to criticism”.

The ruling, which IOOF is appealing in a hearing on Friday, found in favour of two advisers who alleged the Melbourne-based firm sold to Bendigo Bank in 1999, building society offices the pair had separately agreed to franchise (MM October 2, 2003).

Judge Habersberger was critical of IOOF with claims that many key documents were disclosed “belatedly” and “eventually”, leading to contradictions in some witness statements.

“I generally found all of the witnesses called on behalf of the plaintiff(s) to be honestly trying to recall past events… I cannot say the same about all of the witnesses called on behalf of the defendants,” the judge said in handing down his ruling.

“Ms Pearce [a former IOOF employee and now Bendigo Bank chief manager operations, retail] and Mr Mollison [IOOF chief financial officer], in particular were unsatisfactory witnesses. They were not forthcoming about past events, often resorting to evasive or non-responsive answers,” the Judge said.

Habersberger also commented on the evidence of chairman Raymond Shoer, who retired as a director in January 1998, but was recently re-appointed group chairman following the resignation of Charles Macek.

“I am not prepared to accept Mr Shoer’s evidence of what was and was not discussed at board meetings because his recollection was shown to be faulty.”

However, the judge did not accuse Schoer, who is the former Australian Stock Exchange national director operations, of willingly misleading the court.

“Whilst I accept that Schoer was honestly trying to give his evidence, his recollection was shown to be quite faulty when the belatedly discovered documents were examined and his evidence is therefore not reliable.”

IOOF legal counsel,Phillips Foxpartner Brad Ross, says IOOF cannot comment on the case while it is still appealing the overall ruling on liability.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS